Miles Davis from the Inside, Out

I’ve been a Miles Davis fan for more than 30 years. If I haven’t heard every album, I’m 99 percent of the way there. I’ve heard something from every band Miles led or was a part of from 1948 until his death in ’91. I have obsessed over his music, his sound, his mystique, and his overall impact not just on jazz, but on music. After all this time, I was quite sure I could never be truly knocked out by Miles again. As it turns out, I was wrong.

The impetus from this revelation stems from one of the many posthumous box sets Columbia Records and the Miles Davis estate have seen fit to release over the years. In this case, it is Miles Davis & John Coltrane: The Complete Columbia Recordings, 1955-1961. The six CDs in this box make up the efforts resulting in Davis albums Round About Midnight, Newport ’58, Kind of Blue, and Someday My Prince Will Come.

The musicians on these dates are Miles (trumpet), Coltrane (tenor saxophone), Julian “Cannonball” Adderly (alto saxophone), Wynton Kelly (piano), Bill Evans (piano), Paul Chambers (bass), “Philly” Joe Jones (drums), and Jimmy Cobb (drums). To call the music made by these cats “classic” is to sell it woefully short. But that is not the point, in this particular case.

As I listened to these discs, I found myself entranced by the sound of Miles’s trumpet. This is nothing new. Miles was revered for the “vocal” tone of his trumpet, particularly when it was played with a mute. It’s a sound that sends shivers down the spine. But as the music played, I realized I was hearing something different. It was something I had never considered before.

Miles has long been considered a musical innovator, who has shaped the form of music no less than four or five times. The sound of Miles’s music was always in a state of flux, moving forward continuously, even when standing pat would have been perfectly acceptable. Miles, it was said, always wanted to be out front. He always wanted to be “ahead” of the curve. It wasn’t enough for him to embrace a musical trend. He wanted to create the trend. All of this suits me just fine.

Here’s where this particular set knocks me out. It may sound obtuse or pretentious, but I sincerely believe Miles approached his earliest work with Columbia from a completely different angle than the music he helped create after 1961. The music Miles produced after ’61 was played, to my ears, from the outside, in. (*) The ’55-’61 material came from the opposite direction. It was played from the inside, out. And therein lies its beauty.

There is no jazz band in the world I cherish more than Miles’s Second Great Quintet, consisting of himself, Wayne Shorter (tenor sax), Herbie Hancock (piano), Ron Carter (bass), and Tony Williams (drums). The music that band made between 1965 and ’68 is unparalleled. They stretched the limits of acoustic jazz, coming as close as they could to “free-form” without quite going there. When I listen to albums like Miles Smiles and Nefertiti, I hear a band hanging it out over the edge, “clams” be damned. And there were more than a few clams. But Miles made those mistakes sound like part of the composition, which enabled him to get away with it.

This trend continued through the “electric period” that began in 1969 with In a Silent Way, and truly manifested itself with the material Miles produced in the ‘70s. I’m hesitant to refer to that music as “jazz,” because it wasn’t. Purists hated it. I thought it was amazing. It didn’t always work. But that’s what happens when you experiment. Miles essentially demanded his musicians from this era practice on stage. That’s beyond dangerous. Which leads me to my theory.

Starting with the Second Great Quintet, Miles and company were shaping the music as they played it. Miles, it seems, wanted to bend the sound to his will. His trumpet became the glue holding everything together. His sound – be it muted, open, or run through a wah-wah pedal – was raw and aggressive. It fired in fits and starts. It struck with all the subtlety of a jackhammer. Miles’s tone came from an air of confidence bordering on (and sometimes crossing into) arrogance. I can almost hear him telling the music in his raspy voice, “Deal with this, motherfucker!”

But the music he made with Coltrane and Company was something altogether different.

Maybe it was because Miles was in a different headspace. He had just kicked a heroin habit. He was trying to regain his reputation, which had taken a major hit because of the drugs. Most of all, he was trying to recapture his voice. The songs he played during the ’55 to ’61 period allowed him to do just that. Miles seemed to allow the music emanating from tunes like “Ah-Leu-Cha,” “Budo,” “Bye-bye, Blackbird,” and “Dear Old Stockholm” to envelop and guide him. The music bent Miles to its will, and he played his way out of its center. It’s a tender, more vulnerable sound. And it is positively beautiful.

That’s what I mean by playing from the inside, out.

I’m not saying one sound is better than the other. I’m just saying I can hear a difference. I also realize its highly probable Miles would read these words, look me dead in the eye, and say, “Man, shut the fuck up!” But I stand by my assessment.

Of course, the only real way to test my theory is to play the music and formulate your own opinion. Let me know what you think.

(*) Miles’s sound was in transition between ’62 and ’64. The music he made during this time culminated in yet another box set called Seven Steps: The Complete Columbia Recordings of Miles Davis, 1963-1964. I’ll be studying that shortly.


  1. Have to admit, I’ve always been….I guess “intimidated” would be a good word when trying to listen to Miles…I KNOW just how influential he is and I KNOW his talent is unmatched…I just have not been able to find that comfort-zone that we all look for when listening for “new” music we enjoy. And I’m guessing that’s where I’m missing Miles (and the other artists mentioned below)…

    In your opinion, where would/should one start to gain appreciation for his work? Some other artists that I respect and enjoy that fall into this category…John Zorn, MMW, Garage a Trios, believe it or not…early Genesis (not a huge fan and have no idea why), and even some Zappa (Jazz from Hell for example)…is something wrong with me???


    • Start with “Kind of Blue.” It’s the most popular album for a reason. After that, I’d recommend “Sketches of Spain” and “Someday My Prince Will Come.” Let me know how you like them, and we’ll go from there.

      You have to be in the right headspace for Zappa in general, and “Jazz from Hell” in particular. That’s like going from basic math to advanced calculus! Find some stuff in between, and work your way there.

      As for Genesis, get a copy of “Seconds Out.” That’s how I learned about the early years.

      Liked by 1 person

  2. Thanks much for the above suggestions…especially the Miles. love me some Frank, but some of the highly orchestrated material and extended solos can overload these circuits.

    I know I’ve asked before, but what’s your take on recordings of independent origin (ROIO’s)…aka bootlegs? I ask because currently listed on are approx 90 Miles shows available from all periods of his work. Some of these shows are old FM broadcast recordings, so sound quality is crisp & clean…

    To be honest…I love ROIO’s. They have expanded my listening experience exponentially as they take the listener back-in-time to that single point and place. And since I’ve worn the grooves thin on my favorite vinyl, it allows songs that I’ve heard hundreds of times to be heard in a fresh way…almost hearing it again for the first time. And as you say, there are certainly “clams” in these recordings, but they just add to the experience.

    IF you ever decide to jump into this category, I’d be glad to help…the Tapers community has some great musical resources…and they only allow shows that have been approved by the Artists / Bands, so nothing nefarious or illegal. I’d be glad to send you a Miles show from just about any period if you have requests…


    • Ah, bootlegs. I’ve flirted with them off and on since the ’80s. I haven’t heard a ton I was thrilled with, but that was prior to the digital age.

      My number one priority is always to ensure the artist is paid for his efforts. Call me an idealist, but I think fair is fair. If the artists are fine with the exchange of recordings, who am I to argue? They’re not my default musical position, but I am open to possibilities.


      • Copyright infringement in the digital world….there’s a beefy blog topic…

        I COMPLETELY agree with the fact that the artist should be compensated for their work and why they are against taping/bootlegs. It is their property and should be treated as such.

        Yet…a strong argument could be made that bands that DO freely allow taping of their shows…Grateful Dead & Phish top this list (I believe Mr Belew also might have an open taper policy)…have actually profited far more by allowing this practice rather than banning it. BTW…Real Traders never look for profit from the distribution of these shows, but that too is maybe another blog for another day…

        Back to Miles…and bootlegs as an example…I found a 1964 tv broadcast of Miles on the Steve Allen show which is purportedly the 1st recording of Wayne Shorter playing with the Miles Davis Quintet. It’s rough in spots, but, if I were a diehard fan, this would be a must-see. It’s these kind of nuggets that can only be found in the tapers vaults that intrigues me about this avenue. I’ve actually sent a friend of mine who used to play in the band “Saigon Kick” a few boots of his old shows he didn’t even know existed…he thought that was pretty cool.


  3. I think that is a great topic…i.e. economics in modern music. I’ve always wondered how and/or why certain bands get so much damn playtime (FM radio / TV specifically) while others far more talented (IMO) get nearly zilch…and how that airtime trickles down to money the artists actually receive themselves. And now with streaming involved, I see the value of places like Bandcamp.

    I think you mentioned there is a chapter in the book regarding some of these issues, but I could see this topic blossoming into something bigger. Good Luck!


  4. I won’t pretend to be an expert on Miles but I will say that I dig his music. Like you, I just like what he did. This particular band and the recordings were just some of the treasures I found after I discovered Miles with ‘Bitches Brew”. It opened up a whole new world of music for CB. I always loved sax but hearing Coltrane was a different deal. I’m not a musician or even close but this music has an appeal that I couldn’t resist if I tried. Great piece on some great music. I just listened to ‘Blue’ the other day. I guess I will be listening to more after reading your take.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply to bsbokor Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s